Numerical Study on the Influence of Inlet Blockage Ratios and Flow Conditions on Scour Development in Circular Culverts
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluates the effectiveness of Flow-3D numerical simulations in predicting the scour profile, depth, and location downstream of circular culverts under varying flow conditions. Two hydrographs with peak flows of 13.8 l/s and 20 l/s were used to simulate unsteady flow conditions. Each hydrograph included seven different flow discharges, and steady flow tests were conducted at the maximum rates observed during the unsteady scenarios. This study examined circular culverts subjected to inlet blockages of 0%, 25%, and 50% and compared the numerical result from Flow-3D simulations utilizing the Renormalization Group (RNG) turbulence model with observed data. As a result, scour was consistently most significant at 0% blockage across all scenarios and all cases compared to nonblocked cases. Therefore, nonblocked numerical results in the unsteady first hydrograph showed 11.76% and 6.86% increases compared to 25% and 50% blockage, while experimental data indicated 6.97% and 6.45%. For the unsteady second hydrograph, nonblocked scour depths increased by 5.55% and 4.44% in simulations and 3.53% in experiments for both blockage levels. This pattern continued under steady flow conditions: in the first hydrograph, numerical results showed increases of 7.76% and 11.65%, and experimental data showed 8.33% and 11.45%. In the second hydrograph, scour increased numerically by 4.2% and 7.36% and experimentally by 7% and 8.23%.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Studies in Civil Engineering is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY-4.0).
References
Ahmed, K. O., Kavianpour, M. R., Amini, A., & Aminpour, Y. (2024). Physical modeling of the effect of shape, blockage, and flow variability on scour in culvert outlets. Plos one, 19(6), e0306252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306252
Ahmed, K. O., Kavianpour, M. R., Amini, A., & Aminpour, Y. (2024). Numerical modelling of downstream scour in circular culverts: Impact of inlet blockages and variable flow conditions. PloS one, 19(10), e0312501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312501
Ahmed, K. O., Nariman, N., Hawez, D. M., Kisi, O., & Amini, A. (2023). Predicting and Optimizing the Influenced Parameters for Culvert Outlet Scouring Utilizing Coupled FLOW 3D-Surrogate Modeling. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 47(3), 1763-1776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01096-9
Ahmed, K. O., Kavianpour, M. R., Amini, A., & Aminpour, Y. (2025). Numerical assessments of scour depth predictions downstream of box culverts under various flow and blockage conditions. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(3), 211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06391-2.
Ali, S. Z., & Dey, S. (2019). Bed particle saltation in turbulent wall-shear flow. Proceedings: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 475(2223), 1-22.
Amini, A., Ahmed, K. O., & Parvizi, Y. (2022). The effects of check dams on the amount and pattern of flood using hydrological modeling. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2023.2243810
Biswas, R., & Strawn, R. C. (1998). Tetrahedral and hexahedral mesh adaptation for CFD problems. Applied Numerical Mathematics, 26(1-2), 135-151.
Bohan, J. P. (1970). Erosion and Riprap Requirements at Culvert and Storm-drain Outlets: Hydraulic Laboratory Investigation. Waterways Experiment Station.
Cheng, N. S., & Chiew, Y. M. (1998). Pickup probability for sediment entrainment. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(2), 232-235.
Coleman, S. E., & Melville, B. W. (2001). Case study: New Zealand bridge scour experiences. Journal of Hydraulic engineering, 127(7), 535-546.
Day, R. A., Liriano, S. L., & White, W. R. (2001, September). Effect of tailwater depth and model scale on scour at culvert outlets. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water and Maritime Engineering (Vol. 148, No. 3, pp. 189-198). Thomas Telford Ltd.
Ecer, A., Fox, P., Periaux, J., Satofuka, N., & Keyes, D. E. (2000). Parallel Computational Fluid Dynamics: Towards Teraflops, Optimization, and Novel Formulations: Proceedings of the Parallel CFD'99 Conference.
Eghbalzadeh, A., Javan, M., Hayati, M., & Amini, A. (2016). Discharge prediction of circular and rectangular side orifices using artificial neural networks. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20, 990-996.
Flow Science (2012). Version 12.0 user’s manual. Santa Fe, NM: Flow Science.
Galán, Á., & González, J. (2020). Effects of shape, inlet blockage and wing walls on local scour at the outlet of non-submerged culverts: undermining of the embankment. Environmental Earth Sciences, 79(1), 25.
Günal, M., Günal, A. Y., & Osman, K. (2019). Simulation of blockage effects on scouring downstream of box culverts under unsteady flow conditions. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 5305-5310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02461-w
Hirsch, C. (2007). Numerical computation of internal and external flows: The fundamentals of computational fluid dynamics. Elsevier.
Hirt, C. W., & Nichols, B. D. (1981). Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. Journal of computational physics, 39(1), 201-225.
Karami Moghadam, M., Amini, A., & Keshavarzi, A. (2020). Intake design attributes and submerged vanes effects on sedimentation and shear stress. Water and Environment Journal, 34(3), 374-380.
Kim, S. E., & Boysan, F. (1999). Application of CFD to environmental flows. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 81(1-3), 145-158.
Kothe, D. B., Mjolsness, R. C., & Torrey, M. D. (1991). RIPPLE: A computer program for incompressible flows with free surfaces. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from OSTI.
Man, C., Zhang, G., Hong, V., Zhou, S., & Feng, Y. (2019). Assessment of turbulence models on bridge-pier scour using Flow-3D. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(2), 241-255.
Othman Ahmed, K., Amini, A., Bahrami, J., Kavianpour, M. R., & Hawez, D. M. (2021). Numerical modeling of depth and location of scour at culvert outlets under unsteady flow conditions. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 12(4), 04021040. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.00005
Othman Ahmed, K., Kavianpour, M. R., Amini, A., & Aminpour, Y. (2024). A state-of-the-art review of physical modeling of scouring at the culvert outlet. ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2024.2340626
Patel, V. C., Rodi, W., & Scheuerer, G. (1985). Turbulence models for near-wall and low Reynolds number flows-a review. AIAA journal, 23(9), 1308-1319.
Sorourian, S. (2015). Study of blockage effects on scouring pattern downstream of box culverts (Doctoral dissertation).
Sorourian, S., Keshavarzi, A., & Ball, J. E. (2016, December). Scour at partially blocked box-culverts under steady flow. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management (Vol. 169, No. 6, pp. 247-259). Thomas Telford Ltd.
Sorourian, S., Keshavarzi, A., Ball, J., & Samali, B. (2014). Blockage effects on scouring downstream of box culverts under unsteady flow. Australasian Journal of Water Resources, 18(2), 180-190.
Soulsby, R. L. (1997). Dynamics of Marine Sands.
Taha, N., El-Feky, M. M., El-Saiad, A. A., Zelenakova, M., Vranay, F., & Fathy, I. (2020). Study of scour characteristics downstream of partially-blocked circular culverts. Water, 12(10), 2845.
Tong, A. Y., & Wang, Z. (2007). A numerical method for capillarity-dominant free surface flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 221(2), 506-523.
Yakhot, V., & Smith, L. M. (1992). The renormalization group, the ɛ-expansion and derivation of turbulence models. Journal of scientific computing, 7, 35-61.