Real-Time Monitoring of Concrete Strength Evolution Using Embedded Wireless Sensors

Main Article Content

Muhammad Ismaiel Omer
Sirwan Khuthur Malla
Nzar Shakr Piro
Hemn Omer Hamad-Ameen
Omar Qarani Aziz
Ahmed Salih Mohammed

Abstract

The maturity technique offers a practical approach for forecasting early-age strength development. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of Giatec's SmartRock sensors by comparing their measurements with conventional specimen test results derived from the maturity index. Twelve concrete combinations were evaluated, with compressive strengths ranging from 20 to 45 MPa. The nine concrete mixes were designed with varying proportions of cement, sand, coarse aggregate, water, and admixture, as summarised in Table 1. The cement content ranged from 290 to 430 kg/m³, water-to-cement ratios varied from 0.27 to 0.51, and admixture dosages ranged from 0.5% to 1.2% by weight of cement, depending on the desired strength level (20-63 MPa). Cylinder tests performed at 1, 3, 7, 14, and 28 days provided the data necessary to calibrate the maturity–strength relationships. The resulting correlations between compressive strength and maturity index showed excellent accuracy, with coefficients of determination (R²) ranging from 0.986 to 0.999 across all twelve mixes (20-45 MPa). These results confirm that the SmartRock maturity method reliably predicts early-age strength and offers real-time assessment of in-situ concrete performance. The best-fit Vipulanandan models yielded coefficients of determination (R²) ranging from 0.986 to 0.999, demonstrating excellent agreement between sensor-predicted and laboratory-measured strengths. Predicted early-age strengths (3–7 days) differed from test values by less than 5%, confirming the reliability of the SmartRock system for field applications. The study concludes that the maturity method, when properly calibrated, provides a robust and non-destructive means to predict in-place concrete strength in real time, enabling faster formwork removal and improved construction quality control.

Article Details

How to Cite
Omer, M. I. ., Malla, S. K., Piro, . N. S. ., Hamad-Ameen, H. O., Aziz, O. Q. ., & Mohammed, A. S. (2026). Real-Time Monitoring of Concrete Strength Evolution Using Embedded Wireless Sensors . Journal of Studies in Science and Engineering, 6(1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.53898/josse2026623
Section
Research Articles

References

Giatec Scientific Inc. "SmartRock: The World's Leading Wireless Concrete Sensor for Temperature and Strength Monitoring." Giatec Scientific Inc. https://www.giatecscientific.com/products/concrete-sensors/smartrock-maturity-meter/ (accessed Apr 10, 2025).

ACI Committee 228, "ACI 228.2R-13: Report on Nondestructive Test Methods for Evaluation of Concrete in Structures," American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2013.

ACI Committee 318, ACI 318-19: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, 978-1-64195-056-5, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2019.

ACI Committee 306, ACI 306R-16: Guide to Cold Weather Concreting, 978-1-945487-15-6, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2016.

ASTM International, ASTM C1074-17: Standard Practice for Estimating Concrete Strength by the Maturity Method, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/C1074-17.

ASTM International, ASTM C918/C918M-13: Standard Test Method for Measuring Early-Age Compressive Strength and Projecting Later-Age Strength, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/C0918_C0918M-13.

C. Group, CSA A23.1-14/A23.2-14: Concrete Materials and Methods of Concrete Construction/Test Methods and Standard Practices for Concrete, Mississauga, ON, Canada, 2014.

B. S. Institution, BS EN 13670:2009: Execution of Concrete Structures, London, UK, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.3403/30200042U.

f.-I. F. f. S. Concrete, fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Sohn, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433604090.

M. R. W. Australia, Specification 820: Concrete for Structures, Perth, WA, Australia, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au/technical-commercial/technical-library/specifications/800-series-bridge-and-major-structures/ (accessed Apr 25, 2025).

NEN, NEN 5970:2001 nl: Determination of Strength of Fresh Concrete with the Method of Weighted Maturity, Delft, Netherlands, 2001. [Online]. Available: https://www.nen.nl/en/nen-5970-2001-nl-65892 (accessed Apr 15, 2025).

VicRoads, Section 610: Structural Concrete, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2009.

D. Miller, N.-M. Ho, and N. Talebian, "Monitoring of in-place strength in concrete structures using maturity method – An overview," Structures, vol. 44, pp. 1081-1104, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.08.077.

M. Benaicha, Y. Burtschell, and A. H. Alaoui, "Prediction of compressive strength at early age of concrete: Application of maturity," Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 6, pp. 119-125, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2016.03.003.

N. Tareen, J. Kim, W.-K. Kim, and S. Park, "Comparative Analysis and Strength Estimation of Fresh Concrete Based on Ultrasonic Wave Propagation and Maturity Using Smart Temperature and PZT Sensors," Micromachines, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 559, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10090559.

J. Dasch, "Evaluating SmartRock Temperature Sensor Performance in Measuring Concrete Strength," California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cmsp/634/ (accessed May 10, 2025).

C. Vipulanandan, A. Mohammed, and A. Ganpatye, "Smart cement performance enhancement with NanoAl2O3 for real time monitoring applications using Vipulanandan models," in Offshore technology conference, 2018: OTC, p. D041S056R007, doi: https://doi.org/10.4043/28880-MS.