Teachers’ Perceived Work Autonomy in Iranian Public Schools
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the concept of teachers' work autonomy of a sample of Iranian teachers and examine the level of this perceived autonomy based on some demographic variables. The design was a quantitative–descriptive survey, whose population was all teachers in Sanandaj, a city in Iran. The sample was taken based on cluster sampling according to Krejcie Morgan table. The data collection tool, the Teachers’ Appropriate Work Autonomy Questionnaire, was adapted from Friedman (1999) which assesses the extent to which teachers' routine activities should be performed autonomously by the teachers themselves. In order to test the content validity of the teachers' work autonomy questionnaire, a confirmatory factor analysis was run. To test the hypotheses, one-sample t-test, independent sample t-test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests were run. Findings showed that teachers rated their levels of work autonomy lower than the mean level of the relevant scales. Teachers had rated their autonomy below the mean in establishing school identity and praxis, parental involvement, staff development, and extracurricular subjects. Furthermore, their self-assessment for the degree of autonomy in teaching and achievement evaluation was close to the mean, while for curriculum change and development, it was above the mean. Regarding demographic variables, there were significant differences between the degree of teachers' work autonomy in academic degrees, teaching level, and academic degree. However, there was no significant difference between the mean scores of teachers’ self-assessments regarding their level of work autonomy in terms of gender and teaching experience.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Journal of Philology and Educational Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY-4.0).
References
Berry, J. (2012). ‘Teachers’ professional autonomy in England: Are Neo-Liberal approaches incontestable?’. Forum 54 (3), 397–409.
Blase, J. & Kirby, P. (2009). Bringing out the best in teachers: What effective principals do, Corwin Press,
Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarter-ly, 37(5), 662-683.
Boyer, E. L. (1984). Reflections on the great debate of'83. Phi Delta Kappa, 65(8), 525-30.
Brunetti, G. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job satisfaction among long-term high school teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly 28: 49–74.
Charters, W. W. (1974). Sense of teacher work autonomy: Measurement & finding. Eugene: University of Oregon, Pro-ject MITT, Center for Educational Policy and Management.
Common, D. L. (1983). Who should have the power to change schools: Teachers or policymakers? Education Canada, 23(3), 40-45.
Connell, R. W. (1985). Teacher’s work. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
Dale, R. (1982). Education and the capitalist state: Contributions and contradictions, in Apple, M (ed.), Cultural and Economic Reproduction in Education, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Elmore, R. F. (1987). Reform and the culture of authority in schools.” Educational Administration Quarterly 23: 60–78.
Englund, T. (2002). Are professional teachers a good thing?. In Teachers' professional lives (pp. 83-95). Routledge.
Evans, L. (2011). ‘The “shape” of teacher professionalism in England: Professional standards, performance manage-ment, professional development and the changes proposed in the 2010 White Paper’, British Educational Re-search Journal 37 (5), 851–70.
Forrester, G. (2000). ‘Professional autonomy versus managerial control: The experience of teachers in an English pri-mary school’. International Studies in Sociology of Education 10 (2), 133–51
Fox, D. R. (1985). Personal autonomy, psychological sense of community and political ideology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, California.
Friedman, I. A. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and psycho-logical Measurement, 59(1), 58-76.
Gabriel, R., Peiria Day, J. & Allington, R. (2011). ‘Exemplary teacher voices on their own development’, Kappan 92 (8), 37–41.
Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of educational psychology, 76(4), 569.
Grenville-Cleave, B. and Boniwell, I. (2012). ‘Surviving or thriving? Do teachers have lower perceived control and well-being than other professions?’, Management in Education, 26 (1), 3–5.
Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I. (2003). ‘Teachers’ professional lives: Aspirations and actualities’, in Goodson, I. F. and Hargreaves, A. (eds), Teachers’ professional lives (Chapter 1), London: Falmer Press, 1–27.
Hodge, S. A. (2002). Teachers' perceptions of autonomy and administrative support as predictors of self-efficacy: The moderating roles of gender and experience. University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Horng, E. L. (2009). Teacher tradeoffs: Disentangling teachers’ preferences for working conditions and student de-mographics. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 690-717.
Hoyle, E. & John, P. D. (1995). Professional Knowledge and Professional Practice, London: Cassell.
Huber, G. P., & Glick, W. H. (1995). Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving perfor-mance. Oxford University Press.
Ingersoll, R. M. (1994). Teacher Control in Secondary Schools. Harvard Educational Review 64: 150–169.
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American educational re-search journal, 38(3), 499-534.
Ingersoll, R. M., (1997). Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis, NCES 97-069, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education
Jiang, Y. & Ma, T. (2012), ‘A Comparative study of teacher autonomy between novice teachers and proficient teachers in the context of university english teaching reform in China’, Sino-US English Teaching 9 (3), 963–74.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
LaCoe, C. S. (2006). Decomposing teacher autonomy: A study investigating types of teacher autonomy and how current public school climate affects teacher autonomy.” EdD diss., University of Pennsylvania. Dissertations availa-ble from ProQuest. AAI3209987. http://repository.upenn.edu/ dissertations/AAI3209987
Little, D. (1995). ‘Learning as dialogue’, the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy, System 23 (2), 175–81.
Losos, L. W. (2000). ‘Comparing the motivation levels of public, private and parochial high school teachers’, (Doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University) UMI Microform 9973372.
Luthans, F. (1992). Organizational behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ma, X., & Robert B. M. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Research 93: 39–47.
Ma, X., & MacMillan, R. B. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers 'job satisfaction. Journal of Educa-tional Research, 93, 39-47
MacBeath, J. (2012). Future of teaching profession, Brussels: Education International Research Institute
Melenyzer, B. J. (1990). Teacher empowerment: The discourse, meanings and social actions of teachers. Paper present-ed at the annual meeting of the National Council of States on In-service Education, Orlando, Florida.
Melenyzer, B. J. (1990). Teacher empowerment: The discourse, meaning, and social actions of teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on States on In-service Education, Orlando: Florida.
Menter, I., Muschamp, Y., Nicholls, P., Pollard, A., & Ozga, J. (1995). Still carrying the can: Primary‐school headship in the 1990s. School Organisation, 15(3), 301-312.
Moomaw, W. E. (2005). Teacher-perceived autonomy: A construct validation of the teacher autonomy scale (Doctoral dissertation). The University of West Florida. Retrieved: http://etd.fcla.edu/WF/WFE0000027/Moomaw_William_Edward_200512_EdD.pdf
Paradis, A., Lutovac, S. & Kaasila, R., (2015). A Canadian teacher's perceived autonomy and self-confidence in the midst of an educational reform, Problems of Education in The 21st Century, 66, 42-53.
Parker (nee Richardson), G. (2015). Teachers’ autonomy, Research in Education, 93, 19-33, DOI:10.7227/RIE.0008
Pearson, C. & Hall, B. (1993). ‘Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale’. Journal of Educational Re-search 86(3), 172–78.
Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, em-powerment, and professionalism. Educational research quarterly, 29, 38-54.
Pitt, A. (2010), ‘On having one’s chance: Autonomy as education’s limit’, Educational Theory, 60 (1), 1–18.
Porter, A. C. (1989). External standards and good teaching: The pros and cons of telling teachers what to do. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(4), 343-356
Rudolph, L. (2006). Decomposing teacher autonomy: A study investigating types of teacher autonomy and how it re-lates to job satisfaction. EdD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Sentovich, C. (2004). Teacher satisfaction in public, private, and charter schools: A multi-level analysis. Ph.D. diss., University of South Florida.
Shirbagi, N., Zebardast, M. A., & Amani, S. (2016). The study of self-development of principals, leadership and its relationship with motivational factors and self-regulatory skills. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational System, 9(2), 111-130.
Short, P. M. (1994). ‘Defining teacher empowerment’. Education, 114 (4), 488–93.
Stockard, J., & Lehman, M. B. (2004). Influences on the satisfaction and retention of 1st-year teachers: The importance of effective school management. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 742-771.
Strong, L. E., & Yoshida, R. K. (2014). Teachers’ autonomy in today's educational climate: Current perceptions from an acceptable instrument. Educational Studies, 50(2), 123-145.
Whitty, G. (2006), Teacher professionalism in a new era, Available online at http://www.gtcni. org.Uk/publications/uploads/document/annual%20lecture%20paper.pdf (accessed 11 March 2014).
Wilson, S. M. (1993). The self-empowerment index: A measure of internally and externally expressed teacher autonomy. Educational and Psychological Measurement 53: 727–735.
Woods, P. & Jeffrey, B. (2004). ‘The reconstruction of primary teachers’ identities’, in Ball, S. J. (ed.), The Routledge Falmer Reader in Sociology of Education Chapter 11, Oxon: Routledge Farmer, 221–39